← Back

This ONE CIA Tactic Instantly Makes You the Alpha in Any Room

Andrew Bustamante13:22455,832 views2025-12-12
Open original →
0:00

If you don't take control of a room from

0:01

the moment you walk in, then you've

0:04

already lost. CIA knows this is true.

0:07

So, they teach us one powerful tactic to

0:09

take control of any room from the moment

0:12

you walk in without having to say a

0:14

word. I have used this tactic on

0:16

warlords, executives, and even your

0:19

favorite podcast hosts. This is how it

0:21

works. CIA teaches us that taking

0:23

control of a room actually starts before

0:25

you ever step into the room in the first

0:28

place. Dominance isn't gained during a

0:31

conversation. It's gained from the

0:33

moment that you enter the space where

0:34

other conversations are happening. You

0:37

have to control the tempo, the pace, the

0:40

volume, the vocabulary that you actually

0:42

use. It's not about trying to fit into

0:45

what other people are already saying or

0:47

doing in the room. It's about creating a

0:49

whole new frame that actually attracts

0:52

their attention to you. Culturally,

0:55

we've all learned that if we want to

0:56

belong, if we want to be accepted, we

0:59

have to start using the same language

1:00

that other people use. We have to wear

1:02

the same clothes that other people wear.

1:04

We have to have the same hairstyles. We

1:06

have to have the same brand names. We

1:07

have to show up at the same time that

1:09

other people show up. In reality, what

1:11

you're doing is subconsciously

1:13

subordinating yourself to the desires of

1:16

the group. Meaning, you are following

1:18

the frame that the group or that someone

1:21

else has set. Instead, what you want to

1:24

do is come into a room with your own

1:26

frame. A frame that is in competition

1:28

with and distinctly different from

1:31

whatever existing frame is inside the

1:33

room. The reason this works is because

1:35

most people don't have a plan. They

1:37

don't have an outcome. They don't have a

1:39

desire in mind when they show up to a

1:41

board meeting or a staff meeting or even

1:43

a first date. So, as a result, they end

1:45

up doing something called reactive

1:47

framing, which means they're cobbling

1:49

together some sort of structure or ideas

1:51

about what they want from the event

1:53

after they arrive. That's what creates

1:56

so much friction, so much debate, so

1:58

much discomfort and obvious awkwardness

2:01

whenever you're around people that don't

2:03

have a plan. Everyone knows there is no

2:05

plan, but nobody wants to call it out.

2:08

You've had this happen at work. You've

2:09

had this happen around the dinner table.

2:11

You've had this happen on the first

2:12

date, the second date, the 25th date,

2:15

your 15th wedding anniversary. You come

2:17

together and you look at each other

2:18

awkwardly because nobody really has a

2:21

plan what they're trying to get out of

2:24

this time together. That's called a

2:26

reactive frame. You want to create an

2:29

active frame, a deliberate frame. You

2:32

want to control the frame before you

2:35

even walk into the room because

2:37

subconsciously that gives everybody an

2:40

attractive target to follow. It creates

2:42

a very clear leadership dynamic without

2:45

you even having to speak. You do this by

2:48

picking the time that you're going to

2:50

meet. You do this by picking the place

2:52

where you're going to meet. You do this

2:53

by already knowing when the meeting, the

2:56

date, the event will end. You know it

2:59

even before anybody else in the room

3:01

knows it. The reason that's so powerful

3:03

is because even though they don't know

3:05

when the meeting will end, they know

3:07

that you do and they will follow you.

3:10

And when you say it's over, they will

3:13

leave. When you say the date ends, he or

3:16

she will go home. I don't need you to be

3:18

aggressive. I don't need you to be

3:20

assertive. I don't need you to be loud.

3:22

These are very small things that get

3:23

picked up by the subconscious of

3:25

everybody else around you. And I've seen

3:27

them work on powerful men. I've seen

3:29

them work on scared men, broken men,

3:31

angry men. I've seen them work on women

3:34

who were interested in me as much as

3:35

women who had no interest in me at all.

3:38

Because when it comes down to it, a

3:40

frame is really about survival. And all

3:43

human beings are attracted to the thing

3:45

that enhances or increases their sense

3:48

of survival. The idea of survival is

3:50

what actually takes us to the second

3:52

point in this tactic. Not only do you

3:54

want to prepare the frame before you

3:56

even enter the room, but once you enter

3:58

the room, you want to be extremely

4:01

consistent with the frame that you

4:03

create because sustainability equals

4:06

survivability. And survivability makes

4:08

people feel secure. That's why so many

4:11

people are struggling in the world we

4:12

live in right now. They feel insecure

4:15

because of so much instability. all the

4:18

conflicts overseas, the economy here in

4:20

the United States, the changing value of

4:22

our currency, there are so many factors

4:24

that cause instability. And that

4:26

instability makes us feel insecure

4:29

because we all know there is

4:30

inconsistency

4:32

in each of these arenas, whether it's

4:34

international conflict or the economy or

4:36

the job market. So, it's not about

4:38

creating the most dominant frame. It's

4:40

not about creating the most aggressive

4:42

or assertive frame. It's about creating

4:44

the most stable frame. Think about it

4:47

for yourself. If you had to pick between

4:49

a wooden table with four legs or a

4:52

marble table with three legs, what would

4:55

you most likely choose for yourself? No

4:57

doubt you would look at the marble table

4:59

and think to yourself, "That table looks

5:01

much more beautiful. That table looks

5:03

much more attractive." But then you

5:05

would also realize that it's a very

5:07

heavy table because it's made of stone.

5:09

If you haven't discovered your

5:10

natural-born spy skills, then somebody

5:12

else may be using theirs against you.

5:15

CIA teaches us there are only three

5:17

types of people. Those who manipulate,

5:19

those who motivate, and those who are

5:21

being controlled by one of the other

5:23

two. I built a threeinut CIA style quiz

5:27

designed to help you unlock your secret

5:29

psychological advantage and identify

5:31

your biggest blind spot. This quiz will

5:34

help you weaponize your natural gift and

5:36

use it to get ahead of 99% of people in

5:39

power, [music] money, and purpose. Click

5:41

on the first link in the description

5:42

below or scan the QR code on your screen

5:45

right now to take the test. I want you

5:47

to discover your hidden spy skill and

5:49

use it before someone else uses theirs

5:52

against you. And it has to balance all

5:54

that weight on just three legs. So if

5:56

somebody bumps into it the wrong way or

5:58

leans on it the wrong way, the whole

6:00

thing is going to come crashing down.

6:02

where a wooden table may not be so

6:04

attractive at first sight, but when you

6:06

look at the four legs and you think

6:07

about the stability, now you have no

6:09

problems sitting on that table, leaning

6:11

on that table, inviting people to sit

6:13

and join you for a meal around that

6:16

table. Clearly, the stability of the

6:18

table becomes more attractive than the

6:20

material of the table itself. The same

6:23

thing is true when people gather in a

6:25

room. They're looking for the most

6:27

stable, the most consistent, the most

6:29

secure frame in the room, and they will

6:32

follow that frame. The way that you

6:34

present yourself as a stable four-legged

6:37

table is actually counterintuitive to

6:39

what most of us have learned in college,

6:41

on the job, and in the dating arena.

6:43

Rather than being the person who talks

6:45

the most, you actually want to be the

6:47

person who talks the least. The person

6:49

who is silent is the person who really

6:51

controls a room because that silent

6:54

person gets to absorb all the

6:56

information happening in the room. Who's

6:58

talking, what they're talking about,

7:00

what they're saying. The person who's

7:01

quiet is the person who can see verbal

7:03

and non-verbal cues that are showing

7:05

dominance and competition between the

7:07

different people in the meeting. Being

7:09

in control of the frame doesn't mean

7:10

you're speaking the most. It actually

7:12

means you're speaking the least. And

7:15

when you speak, you speak in statements,

7:17

not questions. Again, this is totally

7:20

counterintuitive. Most of us believe

7:21

that if we ask questions, we're somehow

7:23

more attractive. We're less threatening.

7:26

People want to be around us because we

7:27

make them feel interesting. That's not

7:29

completely false. But when you're trying

7:31

to control a room, it's the wrong

7:33

strategy. When you're trying to control

7:35

a room, you want to be the person who

7:36

speaks in statements because statements

7:38

offer finality. Statements offer

7:41

certainty. Statements are also very easy

7:43

for the human brain to process quickly.

7:46

When somebody asks you a question, your

7:48

brain is forced to process not only the

7:50

question itself, but multiple possible

7:53

answers. And it has to decide whether or

7:55

not it should even share the answer with

7:58

you. So all of a sudden, you can see

8:00

that there's a great deal of processing

8:01

that has to happen nearly

8:03

instantaneously when someone's trying to

8:05

answer a question. Instead, when you

8:07

make a statement, there's no processing

8:09

involved. Nobody has to think about

8:11

answers. Nobody has to decide whether or

8:12

not they'll filter their response. All

8:14

they have to do is internally decide

8:16

whether they agree or disagree with your

8:18

statement. So to make yourself the most

8:20

attractive and most stable frame in a

8:23

conversation, thereby taking control of

8:26

the room, all you really have to do is

8:28

speak infrequently and speak in

8:31

statements. Two things that are wildly

8:34

simple and frequently overlooked. The

8:36

last part to understanding this tactic

8:37

is understanding that frames are in

8:39

constant competition. They're dynamic

8:41

and everchanging. They're not static and

8:44

immovable. For example, if you're on a

8:46

date, whether it's your first date or

8:48

whether it's your 500th date, both

8:50

partners are showing up with a frame in

8:53

mind. Maybe it's a reactive frame, maybe

8:56

it's an intentional frame. Maybe she's

8:58

stressed out, maybe he's needy, maybe

9:00

she's distracted, maybe he's horny.

9:03

Either way, you've got two very

9:04

different frames that are walking in in

9:06

competition. Now, with what you've

9:08

already learned here today, you know

9:10

that before you ever walk into that

9:12

date, you want to have already preloaded

9:15

what your frame will be. You want to

9:17

know your outcome. You want to know your

9:19

desire. You want to know your target

9:20

start time, end time, and what you're

9:23

going to talk about before you ever walk

9:25

in. As soon as you present that frame

9:27

inside that date, the second phase of

9:29

the tactic takes over and you appear

9:31

cool, confident, stable, consistent, and

9:34

secure, which makes the other person, no

9:37

matter what frame they're coming from,

9:39

very attracted to your frame

9:42

subconsciously because whether they're

9:44

dreamy or horny, they're coming in and

9:46

they're finding that you are very stable

9:49

and steady. You set the tone. You set

9:52

the pace. You set the conversation. You

9:54

set the tempo. You're giving directions

9:56

where we eat, when we start, what we

9:58

talk about. And that is incredibly

10:00

comforting to everybody because that

10:03

frame of stability is very much like

10:05

that four-legged table, that thing that

10:07

we trust. When you do the first two

10:09

steps of this tactic correctly, the

10:11

third factor, the competition between

10:13

the frames becomes irrelevant because

10:16

the most stable consistent frame is the

10:19

one that wins over time because all of

10:21

the other frames simply collapse. They

10:24

run out of energy, they run out of

10:26

support, or they're killed by the other

10:27

frames in the room, leaving only one

10:30

behind. This is a critical element to

10:32

understanding how you control a room.

10:34

Because in a room of 2, 20, or 50, there

10:37

are so many different frames that

10:39

they're all competing and killing each

10:41

other. So rather than being one of the

10:43

frames that spends your energy fighting,

10:45

you want to conserve your energy and

10:47

wait. Let all the other ideals, all the

10:50

other reactions, all the other emotions

10:52

play out. Because at the end of it all,

10:55

they will see that you sit there

10:57

unchanged, sturdy, stable, quiet, and

11:01

confident, making statements instead of

11:04

asking questions. You want to let all

11:06

the chaos, all the conflict, all the

11:08

competition play out. And you will be

11:11

the source of stability. You will be the

11:13

safe haven that everybody comes back to.

11:16

We call that gravitas. Gravitas pulls

11:19

people to you even if they don't know

11:21

that's what's happening. That's the

11:23

power of being that safe haven. That's

11:26

the power of being the quiet, strong

11:28

person in a room full of noisy, scared

11:31

people. You already know all of this is

11:33

true because you've seen it happen in

11:34

your own life. You've noticed quiet

11:37

people in the room. You've noticed the

11:39

person who doesn't speak very often.

11:41

You've noticed the person who doesn't

11:43

ask a lot of questions. You've been

11:45

attracted to the person who doesn't give

11:47

in to the drama. You've been attracted

11:49

to the person who doesn't play in with

11:51

the conflict and the rivalry. You have

11:53

befriended, you have sought out guidance

11:55

from, you have collaborated with the

11:57

person that looks like they're being

11:58

overlooked by everyone when in fact

12:01

they're gaining everyone's attention.

12:03

That is controlling the frame. That's

12:06

the tactic that CIA taught me that beats

12:08

warlords and beats dictators and

12:10

outsmarts presidents and outsmarts

12:12

clergy and outsmarts parents and

12:14

outsmarts business executives and all

12:16

those people who would spend their time

12:18

talking because when you listen, when

12:21

you're quiet, when you speak in

12:23

statements, when you control the

12:26

silence,

12:27

you control the room. Become that

12:31

silent, powerful, safe haven to the

12:33

other person. Watch their reactive frame

12:36

crumble in the face of your intentional,

12:39

deliberate frame, your preloaded,

12:42

premeditated frame. Watch how you

12:44

achieve your outcomes, and you get your

12:47

desires without the other person even

12:49

realizing they're following your lead.

12:52

This is your chance to take control and

12:55

keep control without having to say a

12:58

word. I'll see you on the other side.